Kouryu Kyoju

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Japan institute
  • Japanese foundation
  • Japan government
  • Japan company
  • Japanese currency

Kouryu Kyoju

Header Banner

Kouryu Kyoju

  • Home
  • Japan institute
  • Japanese foundation
  • Japan government
  • Japan company
  • Japanese currency
Japan government
Home›Japan government›Japanese government adviser lobbied Harvard over probe ahead of Toshiba vote – sources

Japanese government adviser lobbied Harvard over probe ahead of Toshiba vote – sources

By Jane R. Chase
December 22, 2020
0
0

TOKYO (Reuters) – A Japanese government adviser has told the Harvard University endowment fund that his vote at Toshiba Corp’s annual shareholder meeting could face a regulatory probe if he votes against it. company management, four sources said.

FILE PHOTO: The Toshiba logo is seen as a shareholder arrives at Toshiba’s special shareholders meeting in Chiba, Japan March 30, 2017. REUTERS/Toru Hanai

As a result, the American university abstained from voting, three of the sources said. He later learned there was no basis for an investigation, two of them said.

The alleged comment by Hiromichi Mizuno, special adviser to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), contradicts Japan’s efforts to improve corporate governance and draws attention to a meeting that prompted complaints from shareholders.

The Financial Times previously reported that Mizuno told the fund that a vote against management would damage Harvard’s reputation. His mention of a potential investigation and other details of his dialogue with the university are reported here for the first time.

Mizuno did not respond to requests for comment from Reuters sent both by registered mail and by direct message to his actively used Twitter account.

Following the publication of this article by Reuters, Mizuno wrote on Twitter: “I am a METI adviser and a senior fellow of Harvard and I have a long relationship of trust with the endowment fund and as such, I am sometimes called upon for consulting.

“However, it is extremely regrettable that this article, based on testimony from anonymous sources, is written as if the CEO/CIO had been threatened by me on behalf of METI over the exercise of voting rights.”

A METI official said the ministry was unable to comment on the matter and never asked Mizuno to contact Toshiba shareholders.

Mizuno is the former chief investment officer of the $1.4 trillion Japanese government retirement investment fund and a current board member of U.S. electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc. Reuters could not determine his relationship with Toshiba.

A Toshiba spokeswoman said the company was unable to comment. A spokesperson for Harvard Management Company declined to comment, while its chief executive, NP “Narv” Narvekar, did not respond to a request for comment. The four sources declined to be identified as the matter was private.

DETERIORATION

Mizuno contacted Harvard weeks before the July 31 meeting after hearing he was frustrated with Toshiba’s governance, two of the sources said. Toshiba was dogged by accounting issues, and in January revised its financial statements again.

Harvard’s $41 billion endowment owns more than 4% of Toshiba and invests in Singapore-based activist hedge fund Effissimo Capital Management, Toshiba’s largest shareholder with a 9.91% stake, the sources said. .

Mizuno’s initial approach was friendly, but his dialogue with Narvekar via emails and calls soured the weekend before the meeting as deadlines approached for foreign funds to tell local depositories how to vote, said two of the sources.

On a call, Mizuno raised the issue of foreign ownership regulations, the four sources said, referring to a rule that says foreign funds that together own 10% or more of a listed company must report when they intend to coordinate during the vote.

It focused on Harvard’s relationship with Effissimo and voting on board nominees put forward by the hedge fund, two sources said.

Mizuno raised the possibility of a regulatory probe if Harvard votes against Toshiba’s management interests, four sources said. Harvard ultimately abstained, three said.

Reuters could not determine whether Harvard and Effissimo had agreed to coordinate the vote. Effissimo declined to comment.

COMPROMISE

Opponents of Toshiba’s leadership have complained about perceived governance shortcomings under chief executive Nobuaki Kurumatani, who retained his post with 57% of the vote. That’s up from 99% last year in a country where CEOs typically receive overwhelming support.

Effissimo’s three candidates ran into management opposition and were not elected, although one received 44% of the vote.

Effissimo has since called an extraordinary meeting of shareholders to assemble a team of legal experts to investigate, saying some shareholders’ voting rights were compromised.

Reporting by Makiko Yamazaki; Additional reporting by Daniel Leussink; Editing by David Dolan and Christopher Cushing

Related posts:

  1. Japanese government spokesperson launches emergency COVID-19 extension
  2. Japanese government adviser lobbied Harvard over investigation ahead of Toshiba vote – sources
  3. World’s Largest Asset Owner, Japanese Government Investment Fund, Selects New Gender Diversity Index Launched by Morningstar in Collaboration with Equileap
  4. To increase birth rate, Japanese government considers AI to match spouses
Tagsjapanese government

Categories

  • Japan company
  • Japan government
  • Japan institute
  • Japanese currency
  • Japanese foundation

Recent Posts

  • Computational Toxicology Predictive Modeling Service Market Analysis by Trends, Size, Share, Company Overview, Growth and Forecast by 2031
  • ANA urges the Japanese government to remove international constraints
  • A Japanese company develops a bin that freezes garbage to prevent bad odors
  • Foundation Repair Services Market Outlook 2022 and Forecast to 2029
  • Japanese government not liable for damage to refugees from Fukushima nuclear disaster, high court rules say

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • August 2015
  • January 2015
  • April 2014
  • October 2012
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • September 2009
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions