Kouryu Kyoju

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Japan institute
  • Japanese foundation
  • Japan government
  • Japan company
  • Japanese currency

Kouryu Kyoju

Header Banner

Kouryu Kyoju

  • Home
  • Japan institute
  • Japanese foundation
  • Japan government
  • Japan company
  • Japanese currency
Japan government
Home›Japan government›Japanese government contacted Toshiba shareholders ahead of AGM – sources

Japanese government contacted Toshiba shareholders ahead of AGM – sources

By Jane R. Chase
September 16, 2020
0
0


By Makiko Yamazaki, Takashi Umekawa

TOKYO (Reuters) – The Japanese government contacted several foreign shareholders of Toshiba Corp ahead of the conglomerate’s annual meeting, three people familiar with the matter said, in what at least one investor saw as an attempt to influence the vote .

FILE PHOTO: The Toshiba Corp logo is seen behind cherry blossoms at the company’s headquarters in Tokyo, Japan, April 11, 2017. REUTERS / Toru Hanai / File Photo

The revelations raise new questions about interference in Toshiba’s governance, following calls for an investigation into uncounted votes at the controversial July 31 shareholders meeting.

Representatives from the powerful Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) called at least three funds ahead of the meeting to find out if they had collaborated with other investors, two people said.

The ministry paid particular attention to the funds’ collaboration with Toshiba’s largest shareholder, Effissimo Capital Management, a communication that could violate rules preventing shareholders from “acting in concert,” the two people said.

One of the funds interpreted METI’s questioning as a signal to support Toshiba’s management and not investors’ proposals at the meeting, one of the sources said. Foreign shareholders had proposed electing new directors to the board of directors, which management opposed.

The sources declined to be identified because the information is not public.

METI declined to comment when contacted by Reuters, calling the allegations “rumors.”

A representative from Effissimo said the fund could not comment. A spokeswoman for Toshiba said the company would not comment on the speculation.

Reuters reported this month that around 1,300 postal ballot forms were not counted at the meeting.

Last month, a major investor called for an investigation, saying his vote had not been recognized.

Reuters previously reported that the activist fund Effissimo was kept in limbo by the government over its vote until the day before the rally.

Together, the revelations deepened concerns about the treatment of minority shareholders and what appears to be a setback from the campaign for better governance in recent years.

‘ACT IN CONCERT’

Singapore-based Effissimo, which owned around 15% of Toshiba but has since reduced that figure to around 10%, had appointed three candidates to Toshiba’s board of directors. Effissimo said Toshiba’s governance has not improved since an accounting scandal in 2015.

Under Japanese regulations, shareholders deemed to be “acting in concert” may be required to submit ownership declarations or, in some cases, may be charged with insider trading.

METI used a similar approach with several foreign shareholders last year, when US hedge fund King Street Capital Management sought to replace a majority of Toshiba’s board of directors, according to one of the sources and another.

King Street declined to comment.

Investors have often complained about what they call regulatory ambiguity. Some investors and experts also claim that regulations prevent shareholders from working together to improve corporate governance.

In 2017, when Japanese regulators revised the code, one of the public comments submitted to regulators complained that the government had failed to give investors assurance that they could collectively engage with companies without violate regulations.

Nicholas Benes, director of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan and expert on governance, said Japanese regulators should come up with “safe harbor” criteria, similar to Britain’s, which prohibit the use of information privileged but allow investors to make joint recommendations. to businesses.

Toshiba has come under pressure from activist funds since it sold 600 billion yen ($ 5.6 billion) of shares to dozens of foreign hedge funds during a crisis over the bankruptcy of its US nuclear unit in 2017.

At the meeting, Toshiba CEO Nobuaki Kurumatani saw his support drop dramatically to just 58%, down from 99% a year earlier – a rare reprimand from a CEO of Japan Inc.

Reporting by Makiko Yamazaki and Takashi Umekawa; Additional reporting by Noriyuki Hirata; Editing by David Dolan and Lincoln Feast.


Related posts:

  1. Japanese government supports optional four-day work weeks
  2. Nissan received the largest loan guarantee from the Japanese government
  3. Japanese government to help fund submarine cable projects to counter China
  4. International Studies professor Donald Hellmann to receive Order of the Rising Sun from the Japanese government – the highest honor for academics
Tagsjapanese government

Categories

  • Japan company
  • Japan government
  • Japan institute
  • Japanese currency
  • Japanese foundation

Recent Posts

  • Computational Toxicology Predictive Modeling Service Market Analysis by Trends, Size, Share, Company Overview, Growth and Forecast by 2031
  • ANA urges the Japanese government to remove international constraints
  • A Japanese company develops a bin that freezes garbage to prevent bad odors
  • Foundation Repair Services Market Outlook 2022 and Forecast to 2029
  • Japanese government not liable for damage to refugees from Fukushima nuclear disaster, high court rules say

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • August 2015
  • January 2015
  • April 2014
  • October 2012
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • September 2009
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions